DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO,WorldDrugTracker, helping millions, A 90 % paralysed man in action for you, I am suffering from transverse mylitis and bound to a wheel chair,With death on the horizon, This will not stop me, Gods call only..........
DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D ( ICT, Mumbai) , INDIA 29Yrs Exp. in the feld of Organic Chemistry,Working for GLENMARK PHARMA at Navi Mumbai, INDIA. Serving chemists around the world. Helping them with websites on Chemistry.Million hits on google, world acclamation from industry, academia, drug authorities for websites, blogs and educational contributio
n

Sunday, 9 October 2016

Narendra Ambhaikar

Narendra Ambhaikar

Narendra Ambhaikar

Senior Director, Teva Pharmaceuticals

LINKS



Experience



Head - Technical Services, TAPI India

Teva Pharmaceuticals
 – Present (1 year 11 months)Greater Noida
New and existing Generic APIs: new products & their process evaluations, technology transfers and commercial production



Director, Head - R&D (APIs and Intermediates)

Piramal Enterprises
 –  (1 year 4 months)Chennai
Led synthetic and analytical teams in the CRAMS business of Piramal. Enabled teams to generate innovative ideas for the business and deliver molecules (ranging from kilos to metric ton scale) via cost effective and green processes.

Image result for Narendra Ambhaikar
NARENDRA AMBHAIKAR, DHILEEP KRISHNAMURTHY
Piramal Enterprises Limited



Group Leader, Process Research & Development

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
 –  (2 years 3 months)Hyderabad Area, India
Route scouting and process development of NCEs, Intermediates and Generic APIs



Scientist I, then Scientist II - Chemical Development

Vertex Pharmaceuticals (San Diego)
 –  (4 years 6 months)Greater San Diego Area, U.S.A.
Process chemistry (R&D) of clinical candidates and intermediates for HCV and Cystic Fibrosis. Key Publication: Organic Process Research and Development 2015, 19(1), 270–283.



Post-Doctoral Scholar (with Prof. Phil Baran)

The Scripps Research Institute (La Jolla)
 –  (2 years 1 month)Greater San Diego Area, U.S.A.
Total Synthesis of Complex Natural Products: Indole Alkaloids Stephacidins and Avrainvillamide involving New Synthetic Transformations. Key Publications: 1) Journal of the American Chemical Society 2006, 128(26), 8678-8693. 2) Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2005, 44(4), 606-609.



Narendra Ambhaikar, Ph.D.


Ph.D.

Emory University, U.S.A.
 –  (4 years 2 months)Greater Atlanta Area



Research Associate, API Scale Up

RPG Life Sciences
 –  (1 year)Mumbai Area



Summer Trainee

Sanofi (formerly Hoechst)
 –  (2 months)Mumbai
Pilot plant and production, including formulation manufacturing

Education



Emory University (U.S.A.)

Ph.D., Organic Chemistry (Adviser: Prof. Dennis Liotta)

Doctoral Work in Mechanism Driven New Reactions Employing Oxazolidinone and Thiazolidethione Chiral Auxiliaries. Key Publication: Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2003, 125 (13), 3690–3691.



U.D.C.T., Mumbai, India

M.Sc.Tech., Pharmaceutical Chemistry

Investigated applications of chemistry and chemical engineering in the manufacturing of Pharmaceuticals and Fine Chemicals
Image result for Narendra Ambhaikar



Process research as a tool to attain Green Chemistry in the Pharmaceutical Industry
NARENDRA AMBHAIKAR, DHILEEP KRISHNAMURTHY
Piramal Enterprises Limited, Ennore Express Highway, Ennore, Chennai, Tamilnadu 600057, India

KEYWORDS: R&D, API, Green Chemistry by Design (GCbD), Process Research, synthesis, manufacture
ABSTRACT: The pharmaceutical manufacturing industry faces the challenging task of operating sustainably with minimal safety, cost and environmental impact. While the ‘D’ part or process development in R&D is a very critical activity toward the scale-up of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) and intermediates, the ‘R’ part (process research) can also profoundly influence the API manufacturing industry; and it can be a deciding factor in the greenness of the process. The concept of Green Chemistry by Design (GCbD) enables one to understand the relationship between process research, sustainability and economics with respect to API. Proactively designing synthetic routes by recognizing criteria such as safety, environmental, legal, economics, control as well as throughput is an important step in the selection of a practical synthetic route. More often than not, a cost effective process is a green process. Existing and emerging scientific tools and technologies when identified and applied appropriately contribute to greener and more economical routes on large scale. Additionally, with the wealth of new reactions that continue to be discovered in the academic world, the field of process research toward organic compounds continues to remain dynamic, thus providing opportunities to develop green synthetic routes.
INTRODUCTION
The pharmaceutical industry has continued to go through major changes since its inception. More drugs than before continue to be discovered, developed and launched, benefiting the patient and thus reducing the burden of disease. While the advantages of this established and yet growing industry are undeniably obvious, the challenges that it continues to face are unique. Sustainable and efficient production of chemicals with the least impact on the environment remains a difficult task, given the various hurdles faced by the industry such as cost-effectiveness, regulatory, legal, robustness, “greenness” and safety. These changing times have stirred the industrial and academic scientific community to work toward developing better reactions and processes. Until recently, the development of green and environmentally friendly processes remained confined mostly to the innovator and generic pharmaceutical companies; while today the growing API business demands the same in pursuit of sustainability, cost-effectiveness and value addition for its customers.
A sustainable process for an intermediate or an API stems from an innovative, well-thought out and planned process R&D work based on the principles of Green Chemistry. The term E (environmental) factor, defined as the kilograms of waste per kilogram of product, was introduced as a measure of the environmental effect of a manufacturing process in various chemical businesses (1). While there are several other measurable terms and concepts in Green Chemistry, the E-factor remains widely used and represents the actual amount of waste produced in a chemical process (2). Compared to the other segments of the industry, the pharmaceutical and fine chemical industry generates significant waste per kilogram of product, mainly due to the complexity of the synthetic processes involved thus leading to higher E-factors. However, with the introduction of...In order to continue reading this article please register to our website – registration is for free and no fees will be applied afterwards to download contents.


//////////////

Saturday, 8 October 2016

Dr. Marty Guinn



Dr. Marty Guinn
Director of Chemical Development
Chemical Development, Pfizer
Pharma Therapeutics, USA


https://www.linkedin.com/in/martin-guinn-129b286


Summary

Director of pharmaceutical API process development with experience leading process development engineering, process safety, crystallization engineering, and chemical reaction, salt, and polymorph screening groups. Over 25 years of total experience in pharmaceutical process engineering, project management, process research and development, team leader, technology transfer, early development to late-stage registration and validation for projects ranging from small molecules, peptides, natural products, and fermentation products.

Specialties: Process research and development, technology development, team and project leadership, coaching/mentoring, performance management, strategic planning.

Experience

Director, Engineering Technologies and Process Safety

Pfizer
 – Present (6 years 7 months)Groton, Connecticut
Manage the process development engineering and process safety groups responsible for development and scale-up of safe, robust, and efficient batch and continuous chemical processes to produce API for clinical supply and commercial launch of Pfizer NCEs.

Director, Chemical Technologies and Crystallization Engineering

Wyeth
 –  (3 years 9 months)Pearl River, New York
Manage the Process Chemistry Technologies Group (7 chemists) and the Crystallization Technologies Group (1 chemist/4 engineers) in Chemical Development at Pfizer PharmaTherapeutics. Groups are located in Pearl River NY and Montreal. The PCT group conducts high throughput parallel experimentation, DoE experiments, and applies advanced process research technology (FTIR, continuous flow, SMB, etc) to support early stage API process development and clinical supply. The CET group conducts salt and polymorph screening to select a suitable form for development and develops robust crystallization processes to support API delivery.

Principal Development Engineer

Roche Pharmaceuticals
 –  (9 years)Boulder, Colorado
Process development engineer and API project leader responsible for development of robust and efficient chemical processes for Roche NCEs and commercial products. Created and managed the automation lab supporting small molecule and peptide process development.

Process Development Engineer

Array BioPharma
 –  (1 year 2 months)Boulder, Colorado

Process Development Engineer

Molson Coors
 –  (1 year 2 months)Fort Collins, Colorado
Process development engineer responsible for downstream process design for micro algal fermentation process. CoorsBiotech was sold and stopped operation.

Process Development Engineer

Abbott Laboratories
 –  (4 years 11 months)North Chicago, Illinois
Plant process engineer responsible for capital project design and execution for API batch multipurpose plant. Process development engineer responsible for development of robust and efficient batch processes for small molecule APIs.

Education



How Pfizer Is Improving Process Development For Bench Scientists

Recently, Dr. Marty Guinn, Director of Chemical Development for Pharma Therapeutics at Pfizer, wrote:
Marty Guinn Pfizer Chemical Development
Dr. Marty Guinn, Pfizer
“Productivity, reproducibility and confidence are important to us. In our experience, the EasyMax meets all the requirements and has opened the door to the potential of automation to improve the efficiency of process development for our bench scientists.  Currently, our chemists and engineers are utilizing the EasyMax on a daily basis for both early and late-stage process development in a variety of applications and venues. We are actively distributing basic EasyMax units to individual users and allowing them to individually up-grade to more advanced systems and their confidence and creativity develops. We have established walk-up EasyMax work stations consisting of several units linked together through iControl for Design of Experiment (DoE) experimentation for process chemists.”
In his role as Director of Chemical Development at Pfizer Pharma Therapeutics, Marty manages the Process Chemistry Technologies Group and the Crystallization Technologies Group.  The Process Chemistry Technologies Group conducts high throughput parallel experimentation, DoE experiments, and applies advanced process research technology (FTIR, continuous flow chemistry, etc.) to support early stage Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) process development and clinical supply. The Crystallization Technologies Group performs salt and polymorph screening to select a suitable form for development and develops robust crystallization processes to support Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) delivery.
Image result for Marty Guinn pfizer
At DynoChem 2011 in Rosemont, Illinois, Martin Guinn, PhD, Director of Engineering and Process Safety for Pfizer (Groton), presented on his team’s work in “Enabling Continuous Chemistry in Early Development.”
Guinn noted that Pfizer started a “serious effort” about a year ago to enable flow chemistry to assist in developing its early-phase portfolio. “The driver for doing this is speed to API,” he said. 

Of late, there’s been much more interest in flow chemistry, Guinn acknowledged, but “we also know there aren’t many examples of continuous processes going into manufacturing.” One of the keys to changing this is doing more pre-Proof of Concept (i.e., pre-Phase II) flow chemistry work, he said. 

One of the traditional bottlenecks in early-phase manufacturing has been the ability to make substantial amounts of API within the time constraints of early clinical work. “We need to make a lot of API, and quickly,” he said. “That’s where the value proposition for flow is.”

Flow chemistry, Guinn said, enables:
  • a broader chemical space
  • the ability to directly scale medicinal chemistry routes
  • improved selectivity and reactivity
  • the ability to prepare larger quantities of material with the same hardware (that is, to just run equipment longer).
All of these elements relate to speed to delivery and speak to a clear value proposition, Guinn noted. 

He next presented examples of work done, and equipment used, in one of Pfizer’s kilo labs. In one standard reaction, 1-2 kg of product was produced in a day via flow operations, whereas it typically required one week to produce the same amount through batch processes. Guinn also presented examples of some of the modeling being done to support these efforts.

Some of the keys to success of pre-POC flow work, according to Guinn:
  • the creation of a dedicated pre-POC flow team (chemistry, engineering, process safety, analytical)
  • integration of key skill sets and capabilities
  • creation of a Flow Lab for small-scale prep and technology development and assessment
  • improving workflows for indentifying “flowable” substrate and for making a rapid flow assessment.
Of course, there are also many opportunities for using flow chemistry post-POC—for example, in isolation and drying—and this work will complement early-phase flow chemistry. Pfizer already has several products (Celebrex and Lyrica are two) that have made use of some flow elements in second-generation manufacturing efforts.

Guinn expects to see more flow chemistry in first-generation product development efforts as well. In order for this to happen, manufacturing teams must overcome many traditional challenges:
  • existing batch manufacturing capacity means that there is “not as much pull from manufacturing colleagues for flow processes”
  • there is lower API demand for new products, and thus materials cost is not as much of a driver as it has been in the past
  • regulatory and operational challenges
  • suitable batch synthetic strategies
“Work doing in pre-POC will ultimately have some influence in post-POC,” he said. Regardless, “if we can expand process chemistry [using flow] in the pre-POC space, we will have been successful.”